Hi,
I'm about to install/configure an AlwaysOnVPN solution and am deciding to use DHCP or a pool from the AOVPN server itself.
In previous deployments I've always configured a pool on the servers themselves.
From the MS documentation (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/remote/remote-access/vpn/always-on-vpn/deploy/vpn-deploy-ras) I can find this :
"You can feasibly assign addresses from either a pool or a DHCP server; however, using a DHCP server adds complexity to the design and delivers minimal benefits."
Are these pros/contra's described somewhere?
If I'm correct a downside of using a DHCP scope is that all clients do not show their FQDN, but the name of the RRAS server.
I'm about to install/configure an AlwaysOnVPN solution and am deciding to use DHCP or a pool from the AOVPN server itself.
In previous deployments I've always configured a pool on the servers themselves.
From the MS documentation (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/remote/remote-access/vpn/always-on-vpn/deploy/vpn-deploy-ras) I can find this :
"You can feasibly assign addresses from either a pool or a DHCP server; however, using a DHCP server adds complexity to the design and delivers minimal benefits."
Are these pros/contra's described somewhere?
If I'm correct a downside of using a DHCP scope is that all clients do not show their FQDN, but the name of the RRAS server.